Taking the "L"esley Out of Libertarian
It's official. I no longer consider myself a libertarian, small "l" or other. The more libertarians I find myself in contact with over the Internet, the more I realize that I really don't have much in common with them.
One thing I have believed since I was in college is that people should pay for the things from which they benefit. We all benefit from having an educated populace. We all benefit from not having significant portions of the population living in extreme poverty. Those two things are conducive to a large middle class, which, in turn, is conducive to political stability and continuing prosperity. If anyone doubts that, they should simply look at countries where there is a vast gulf between the wealthy and the poor. Look at the crime rates. Look at the political instability, frequently addressed through the imposition of a dictatorship. I'm sure that the vast majority of people in this country would agree that lower crime rates are more optimal than higher ones, and that democratic forms of government (in which I include federal and parliamentary republics) are more optimal than totalitarian ones.
Since we all benefit from having an educated populace that doesn't have significant numbers of people living in extreme poverty, and I believe that we should pay for the things from which we benefit, it only follows that I would believe that we should pay for educating children and having a social safety net. In a country as large and geographically disperse as this one, I must confess that I believe the most effective way to pay for those things is through taxation. Yes, I believe we should have publicly-funded education. Yes, I believe we should have a government-provided social safety net. There was a time when I didn't believe the latter. But no more. I'm just not a libertarian any longer. At least not one like the majority I come in contact with.
I haven't changed my views on everything. I still believe in a flat tax. I still believe that the government shouldn't be intruding in the choices of consenting adults. I still believe that drugs should be legalized, use-taxed, legal-aged, and restricted to times when one isn't operating a vehicle or performing some other task when being high could harm another (like surgery). I still believe that parents are primarily responsible for making sure their kids are raised properly.* But since so many libertarians I run across these days are taking the line that they shouldn't have to pay to educate your kids, because they aren't getting any benefit from that, I disassociate myself with them. I'll gladly pay taxes to educate your kids and to make sure that people aren't living in extreme poverty. I like the benefits too much to give them up.
This only leaves the question of which third party candidate I'm voting for in November. Well, I didn't say I was becoming a Democrat, you know.
*Actually, I've never met anyone who explicitly believes otherwise. However, I do think that people who want to censor entertainment for everyone because it might not be good for children are effectively believing otherwise.
Comments
Since when do you believe in legalizing drugs? First that I've heard of it. Whenever I've advocated it in the past, you've disagreed with me. Now how about prostitution? Should that be legalized, too? (I believe it should and be regulated and taxed, with tax proceeds being used to provide social support for prostitutes, incl. helping them to get out if they want to).
Posted by: Jon | February 8, 2004 08:21 PM
Oh, just for quite a while now.
Posted by: Lesley | February 9, 2004 06:50 AM
I enjoyed this post and hope you don't mind the commentaryI posted over at CentristAmerica.com
Posted by: Militant Moderate | February 9, 2004 07:52 PM
Prostitution is legal in Australia. Doesn't seem to be a problem. (Not a wonderful line of work, mind you, but...)
Drugs aren't legal, at present. (As in, the usual illegal drugs are illegal here too.) Drug-related crime is a problem.
Posted by: Pixy Misa | February 9, 2004 11:03 PM
Welcome to the rest of the world! :)
I always feel that political groups should be convincing that they are like me, not the other way around. I yam what I yam. Why shoe-horn your brain into a jello mold? Who does that benefit? Now maybe knowing your political bent helps on voting day....
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your post. Is your point that you are more concerned about losing a community (of libertarians) than that you are suddenly changing your mind?
But really, who feels totally at home with one political ideology? Say bye, bye to the Libs and be free.
Posted by: John | February 10, 2004 11:32 AM
Oh just become a commie like me.
Posted by: Jane | February 10, 2004 09:52 PM
Ok, you've proven your point about being on the legalize drugs bandwagon for a while, but since when have you ever espoused that parents are responsible for raising their children properly? Can you back that up with past Blog entries? I double dare you. I triple dare you.
Posted by: Jon | February 11, 2004 06:45 AM
I've always felt that libertarianism was good for gay(male) radio talk show hosts, but for the real world it just doesn't apply. At some point the rubber has to hit the road. If it's weak, you're going off into a ditch.
Posted by: BSB3 | February 17, 2004 07:50 PM