Fictional Fears
CalPundit points to a piece by James Lileks which offhandedly claims that the male version of The Handmaid’s Tale would probably never be published. Specifically, Lileks is talking about a book where the world is run by gays who breed a ruling class via genetic manipulation and the struggle of one man to defy his programming, so it is not completely analogous to the example that CalPundit found on Henry Farrell’s blog. However, both The Handmaid’s Tale and The Feminists point to an interesting phenomenon that is often overlooked in discussions about what could be published at any given time – namely that fiction tends to mirror current societal fears.
The Feminists was written in 1971. It is a dystopia in which feminists now rule the world, and men are relegated to nothing more than chattel for breeding purposes. To make matters worse, women are apparently trying to find a way to even eliminate the need to use men for breeding. One man has broken the law by making love to a consenting woman without permission from the government. He becomes a fugitive and runs across other people who have broken similar laws and are fighting to overthrow their feminist oppressors.
The Handmaid’s Tale was written in 1986. It tells of a dystopia in which right-wing religious fundamentalists have taken over and fertile women are relegated to nothing more than chattel for breeding purposes for the upper class (since most women were rendered infertile after exposure to pesticides, nuclear waste, and chemical weapons). One woman develops an illicit sort of relationship with the upper-class man she is sent to have children for (he plays Scrabble with her, brings her cosmetics and a cocktail dress), but does not become pregnant by him. The man’s wife then arranges for her to sleep with the chauffeur. They develop a relationship, and she thinks she is pregnant. The wife then discovers the cocktail dress and has the protagonist arrested. In the end, she escapes to safety thanks to rebel forces.
Consider what was going on in society during the times these two novels were written. In 1971, feminism was on the rise. It was a new, intense force; one whose rhetoric was novel to the masses. Women were burning their bras, marching for freedom. The sexual revolution was at its height. This was a profound challenge to society’s long-held traditions. More women were working, threatening the jobs of men. Women were behaving more like men in their sexual lives, which was further threatening to men. The Feminists perfectly echoed the fears of society, as its mores were challenged and changed. However, dystopic representations of a female-ruled world were not precisely new. Tales such as The Revolt of Man and A World of Women were written during the women’s suffrage movement as well.
By 1986, although feminism had made great strides, as a political movement it had suffered a big backlash. The Equal Rights Amendment had been defeated. Feminism as a movement was considered to be peopled by radical man-hating dykes, thus turning off ordinary women who probably support the true goals of feminism. Like many political movements that challenged the traditional orthodoxy, it was marginalized and defined by its most extreme members. Instead, Jerry Falwell’s Moral Majority, instrumental in the 1980 election of Ronald Reagan, was not far removed from its heyday. Fears of radical feminists gaining too much power were replaced by fears of Christian conservatives gaining too much power. The Handmaid’s Tale told of those fears.
Examples of pop culture producing material that bely our deepest fears abound. Societal fears of technology drove sci-fi writers to portray technological dystopias. Consider The Terminator, The Matrix, anything by Philip Dick, even Brave New World and Metropolis. Our fears of totalitarianism were expressed in 1984, Anthem, and Brazil. For that matter, even The Lord of the Rings expresses a fear of totalitarianism, as well as a fear of the loss of nature. In the original Star Trek, the Klingons seemed to represent the Russians at a time when the Cold War was in full swing. By the time we got to The Next Generation, the Cold War was ended, but we feared being economically displaced by the Japanese. Suddenly the Romulans became a bigger threat, and their dress took on shades of Japanese samurai costumes.
In this context, it is not surprising that The Handmaid’s Tale should be considered relevant today. Christian conservatives still represent a force to be reckoned with in American politics. The type of novel that Lileks describes doesn’t really represent our current fears. Most Americans are just not afraid that homosexuals are going to take over the world; we like heterosexual sex too much. Feminist has also become something of a dirty word. Although, a movie entitled The Stepford Husbands was produced in 1996, so female-run dystopias are not so far out of the mainstream as some might like to think.
Comments
Another example of “fiction tends to mirror current societal fears”.
Two old radio science fiction programs, Dimension X (1950-51) and X Minus 1 (1955-58) mirrored the fears of the Cold War. Many people expected to be either blown up by a nuclear bomb or die of radiation during that period.
Most of these programs had one of two plots:
The world is going to end in a month, a week or a day. Thankfully, each show had a different reason why the world was coming to an end.
US space ship lands on a planet and finds that an old civilization has destroyed itself in a war. Radioactivity from the war had created mutants that attacked the space explorers. The mutants varied from program to program in type and power.
Posted by: Jake | May 19, 2003 08:17 PM
Fact also reflects these fears as well. Remember the wacky 70's, the anti-establishment rage was carried out by the left wingers. Groups like the Move, the Black Panthers, the Weathermen, and of course who can forget the Symbionese Liberation Army. All of these groups spouted pseudo Marxist platitudes while committing their crimes. Fast forward to the mid 80's until the mid 90's. Now it was the Right wingers turn to be anti-establishment (they would use the term anti-government) The Michigan Militia, The Montana Freemen, Texas Separatists, Army of God. All of these groups would spout pseudo federalists platitudes wile committing their crimes. In fact I expect to see some left wing groups start to kick up some dust if they see a republican dominance of the political landscape for the next decade or so.
Posted by: Rick DeMent | May 20, 2003 03:30 PM
There is a sort of anti-feminist dystopian nover that was published a bunch of years ago. A Philosophy professor, Lou Marinoff, in New York wrote Fair New World which was premised on the idea that Political Correctness took over part of the world, and male chulvanism took over another part. . .
The book is of little literary merit, but it does make a point.
Posted by: karl czemer | May 20, 2003 05:19 PM
I read that one too, they were going to make it into a musical starring David Bowie and Antia Bryant as the star crossed lovers who break rank.
Posted by: Rick DeMent | May 20, 2003 09:31 PM
But you can bet if homosexuals did take over the world, the decor would be positively sublime.
Posted by: andy | May 21, 2003 03:14 PM
Well, the thing is, It's A Gay, Gay, Gay, Gay World would still not be as much about subverting the dominant paradigm as The Handmaid's Tale is, because it doesn't take a lot of imagination to envisage a world run by men.
Posted by: Elayne Riggs | May 23, 2003 02:01 PM